Here are two stocks with a buy rank and strong value characteristics for investors to consider today, February 23:
Tri Pointe Homes TPH: This single-family home design, construction and sales company is ranked Zacks #1 (Strong Buy) and has seen the Zacks consensus estimate for earnings next year rise 12.8% over the past few years. last 60 days.
Tri Pointe Homes Inc. Pricing and Consensus
Tri Pointe Homes Inc. price-consensus-chart | Tri Pointe Homes Inc. Quote
Tri Pointe Homes has a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 4.34, versus 6.10 for the industry. The company has a Value Score of A.
Tri Pointe Homes Inc. PE Ratio (TTM)
Tri Pointe Homes Inc. pe-ratio-ttm | Tri Pointe Homes Inc. Quote
Golden Ocean Group GOGL: This shipping company that deals in the transportation of dry bulk cargoes carries a Zacks rank No. 1 and witnessed the Zacks consensus estimate for its current year profits increasing by 5.4% in the course of the last 60 days.
Golden Ocean Group Limited Pricing and Consensus
Golden Ocean Group Limited Price Consensus Chart | Quote from Golden Ocean Group Limited
Golden Ocean Group has a price/earnings ratio (P/E) of 8.27, compared to 10.50 for the industry. The company has a Value Score of B.
Golden Ocean Group Limited PE Ratio (TTM)
Golden Ocean Group Limited pe-ratio-ttm | Quote from Golden Ocean Group Limited
See the full list of top-ranked stocks here.
Learn more about Value Score and how it’s calculated here.
Just Released: Zacks’ 7 Best Stocks For Today
Experts have pulled out 7 stocks from the Zacks #1 Ranking 220 Strong Buys list that have beaten the market more than 2 times with an astonishing average gain of +25.4% per year.
These 7s were selected because of their superior potential for immediate breakout.
See these time-sensitive tickers now >>
Click to get this free report
Tri Pointe Homes Inc. (TPH): Free Inventory Analysis Report
Golden Ocean Group Limited (GOGL): Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com, click here.
Zacks Investment Research
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
